STABLE TV × MARTHA ANN (UA)
Full Funnel Impact. 180d window. Oct 28, 2025 - Apr 26, 2026.
Period window
Default: Era. Phase 1 hero, -24% / 8-week window.
Era read. Phase 1 hero peak. 3wk Sep 22 - Oct 12 2025. Halo CAC $12.41 vs $14.37 baseline. -14%. Peak week Sep 29 -25%. First 8 weeks averaged -24%. Halo MER 1.28×.
Operational view below. Same underlying data, alternate framings live in the methodology card. Methodology card ↓ shows all three with the math.
Era read
Phase 1 hero peak. 3wk Sep 22 - Oct 12 2025. Halo CAC $12.41 vs $14.37 baseline. -14%. Peak week Sep 29 -25%. First 8 weeks averaged -24%. Halo MER 1.28×.

Are these the right customers?

population default · case-study-blinded-DTCL5

Volume is cheap if the customers don't stick. Tracking how customers behave AFTER they land - do they convert, do they stay subscribed, do they outperform the ones who came in via discount-driven social? TV-acquired customers should retain better. If they don't, the channel is firing but the message is wrong.

Synthetic mock · methodology preview. The retention + funnel + LTV numbers below illustrate what the layer renders once a real brand's 60-90d cohort window fits the model. Architecture is production-ready; values populate at onboarding once the orders + customers ingestion lands.

90-day retention · TV-acquired vs paid-social cohort.

Cohort retention curve · model fit refit weekly
56%68%80%91%103%COHORT RETENTION %acquisitiond0d15d30d45d60d75d90
actualobservedpredictedmodel fit (range shaded)baselinecounterfactual (no treatment)

Read it like an LTV operator. Both cohorts start at 100% on acquisition day. The orange line (TV-acquired actual) decays slower than the gray dashed line (paid-social cohort counterfactual) because TV-acquired customers came in via brand-recall, not discount. By day 90 the gap is +8pp - that's 8 more customers per 100 still active, monetizing for another 90+ days at the brand's retention LTV. The blue line is the model fit; the shaded band is the range.

OD-to-Sub rate · during TV flight+1.4pp hold
23.7%
vs pre-flight 4w baseline 22.3%. Quality acquisition confirmed. Customers are converting to subscription at flight-window rates above baseline.
Cohort 90d retention · TV-acquired+8pp
68%
vs paid social cohort 60%. TV brand-driven acquisition has stronger downstream LTV than discount-driven social.

Cohort funnel · TV flight vs dark window

Visits
+18% vs dark
100%
Sign-ups
+12% vs dark
62%
First purchase
+9% vs dark
38%
Subscribed
+1.4pp vs dark
24%

The "is it good volume?" question. Decision rule: if first-purchase / OD-to-Sub holds during flight AND cohort retention beats paid-social cohort by 5pp+, scale TV with LTV-positive confidence. If volume grows but conversion drops, fix creative + targeting before scaling - channel is working, message is wrong.

MethodologyThe LTV stack · how we read cohort behavior

Purchase-frequency model. Forecasts how often each cohort will buy over a given horizon. Foundational papers Schmittlein-Morrison-Colombo 1987 + Fader-Hardie 2005. Open-source library: lifetimes (Python) or open-source CLV module (more actively maintained 2026).

Spend-per-purchase model. Pairs with the frequency model to give expected customer lifetime value per cohort over a T-month horizon.

Churn-risk model. Lets you say "customer's churn risk doubles between month 4 and month 7" instead of just "60% still here at 90 days." Open-source library: lifelines.

Cohort-level treatment effect. Identifies which acquisition cohorts have TV-driven LTV uplift versus which don't. The board-grade sentence: "customers acquired during TV-on weeks have 23% higher 12-month CLV than TV-off weeks, controlling for cohort age." Open-source library: EconML.

The full fit runs in a Python worker once the brand provides 12+ months of transaction data. Dashboard-side lib/compute/clv-bgnbd.ts ships a simpler frequency × AOV stub for the demo.